NLRB Counsel to Search Authorized Motion Over Noncompete Clauses

[Stay on top of transportation news: Get TTNews in your inbox.]

In a memo to regional administrators and officers, Nationwide Labor Relations Board Normal Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo has pledged to pursue authorized motion towards “sure employers” who require nonsupervisory staff to signal noncompete agreements.

“In workplaces throughout America, many employers are requiring their staff to signal noncompete agreements to acquire or maintain their jobs, or as a part of a severance settlement,” Abruzzo mentioned within the memo Could 30. “Usually talking, noncompete agreements between employers and staff prohibit staff from accepting sure sorts of jobs and working sure sorts of companies after the top of their employment.”

Abruzzo’s memo encourages NLRB regional officers to “undergo recommendation circumstances involving noncompete provisions which are arguably illegal, in addition to arguably meritorious particular circumstances defenses.”

“In acceptable circumstances, areas ought to search make-whole reduction for workers who, due to their employer’s illegal upkeep of an over-broad noncompete provision, can exhibit that they misplaced alternatives for different employment, even absent extra conduct by the employer to implement the availability,” the memo mentioned. “On this regard, areas ought to search proof of the influence of over-broad noncompete agreements on staff and, the place relevant, current at trial proof of any hostile penalties, together with particular employment alternatives staff misplaced due to the agreements.”

In her memo, Abruzzo quotes an estimate that roughly 18.1% of American staff — roughly 28 million people — are topic to a noncompete settlement, together with roughly 13.3% of staff incomes lower than $40,000 per 12 months.

Abruzzo’s memo comes on the heels of a latest comparable effort by the Federal Commerce Fee with the identical goals as Abruzzo.

The FTC in January issued a noncompete clause proposed rule declaring that it’s an unfair methodology of competitors for an employer to “enter into or try to enter right into a noncompete clause with a employee; to take care of with a employee a noncompete clause; or, below sure circumstances, to symbolize to a employee that the employee is topic to a noncompete clause.”

The FTC proposal acquired greater than 20,000 written feedback, together with one in opposition from American Trucking Associations.

“As a basic matter, whereas there are official public coverage considerations in regards to the extreme use of restrictive employment covenants like noncompetition agreements, particularly for line manufacturing staff, the FTC lacks the authorized authority to control on this space,” ATA wrote. “As a coverage matter, the broad-brush proposal can also be dangerous broadly and particularly to these FTC seeks to guard.

“Certainly, if finalized, the direct end result will probably be a lower in employer-provided coaching for priceless, private, moveable credentials akin to industrial driver’s licenses. This might exacerbate the already tight labor marketplace for industrial truck drivers, additionally resulting in shopper hurt — notably a topic really throughout the FTC’s jurisdiction — from corresponding injury to our already fragile provide chain.”

“Abruzzo’s assault follows her earlier pronouncement that confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in separation agreements will probably be carefully scrutinized, and in addition joins the federal authorities’s broader motion to limit or get rid of noncompete agreements,” mentioned a legislation alert issued by the Indianapolis-based transportation legislation agency of Scopelitis, Garvin, Gentle, Hanson & Feary.

“It stays to be seen whether or not Abruzzo’s push will discover assist with the complete NLRB, or whether or not, as a substitute, her efforts will probably be acknowledged by the NLRB because the overreach in company energy that it appears.”

The Proprietor-Operator Unbiased Drivers Affiliation supported the FTC’s proposal.

“Regardless of the circumstance, we’ve discovered that noncompete clauses are dangerous to the trucking trade,” OOIDA wrote in feedback. “OOIDA concurs with FTC’s findings that noncompete clauses have negatively affected competitors in labor markets, leading to decreased wages for staff throughout the labor power, and have restricted particular person alternatives to search out work. We assist FTC’s proposal to ban employers from imposing noncompete clauses on staff, together with unbiased contractors.”